Choice of baseline scenario for RCS chain parameters in existing CERN tunnels30m
To discuss:
- 3 RCS with: NC RCS in SPS tunnel, NC and hybrid RCS in LHC tunnel
- 3 RCS with: NC and hybrid RCS in SPS tunnel, hybrid RCS in LHC tunnel
- 2 RCS with: NC RCS in SPS tunnel and hybrid RCS in LHC tunnel
Speakers:
Alexej Grudiev(CERN), Antoine Chance(CEA Irfu), David Amorim(CERN), Elias Metral(CERN), Fabian Batsch(CERN), Heiko Damerau(CERN), Ivan Karpov(CERN)
17:29
→
17:30
Follow-up points1m
Few open points for follow-up:
Priority 1
Optimize losses in RCS chain for best overall performance, allowing different transmission in the two or three machines
Difficult with lots of degrees of freedom: straight-forward only for constant acceleration
Difficulty of different magnets (ramp rate)
How to distribute total RF length over different machines? Minimization of overall total voltage?
Acceptable longitudinal emittance growth in the RCS chain and how to quantify it exactly?
Needs figure from low-energy acceleration (low energy), longitudinal emittance for colliders as a starting point. Criteria also on how much bunch is distorted. What is acceptable bunch shape deviation in the collider?
How do define a reasonable synchronous phase?
First start for constant acceleration, then real ramps
Average gradient of RF sections
1.3 GHz: agreed 30 MV/m (conservative) and 45 MV/m (aggressive)
800 MHz?
Transient beam loading and counter-rotating bunches and multi-turn effects?
Avoid that counter-rotating bunches meet in RF section
Impact on placement of RF around the circumference?
Longitudinal matching
How to generate the short bunch length required for the transfer into the collider ring?
Longitudinal matching of RCS with pre-acceleration stages (injection) and collider (ejection)
Can the ILC cavity (possibly in a modified form) be used for the muon RCS?
Power in higher-order modes (HOMs) is potential show-stopper
Need refined paek and average power calculations for HOM couplers
Resistive wall impedance?
David following chamber materials
More detailed lattice model, beyond smooth approximation.
David developed a MAD-X lattice generator (from high-level machine parameters for muon RCS)
Introduce chromaticity in transverse studies, do we need sextupoles?
Priority 2
Cost functions per machine part: could one make an assumption for a cost per unit length of RF (plus some infrastructure cost offset per RF section), idem for unit length of magnets?
Would two RCS be sufficient to accelerate from 60 GeV to 1.5 TeV?
Does not look very attractive
Is transition gamma of ~20 a good number for the first RCS stage?
Check various transition gammas and their impact -> David to present
Further options
FFA alternative for RCS?
Treated, at least in some detail
What are the consequences if we want to use the LHC as the last accelerator ring?