Discussion about possible ECAL/HCAL in 2026
-
-
07:00
→
07:20
Inputs for today's discussion 20mSpeakers: Hidetoshi Otono (Kyushu University (JP)), Zhen Hu (Tsinghua University (CN))
-
07:20
→
07:40
Quick summary from discussion with Jamie 20mSpeaker: Tomohiro Inada (Kyushu University (JP))
Agenda & Discussions
-
Detector Position and Physics Potential
-
The potential impact from the crossing angle needs to be discussed.
-
Evaluated PID capabilities for nueCC vs. numuCC distinction.
-
Jamie recommended clearly defining fiducial volumes to ensure the containment of neutrino interactions, avoiding energy leakage.
-
-
Trigger Rate Concerns
-
Initially predicted trigger rate at ~3.1 kHz, Jamie raised concerns this could realistically reach ~10 kHz.
-
Required adjustments to trigger threshold and efficiency need to be discussed.
-
-
Detector Monitoring System
-
Monitoring via Ethernet confirmed, covering temperature and current sensors within detector electronics.
-
-
Infrastructure, Dimensions, and Transport
-
Detector's dimensions (particularly width) are critical for transport along the LHC.
-
Heavy steel plates within the detector need disassembly/reassembly at the installation site.
-
Tilted installation surface necessitates a support structure ensuring parallel alignment to the line-of-sight.
-
-
Data Acquisition and Integration
-
Challenges discussed regarding the integration of additional scintillator channels and synchronization with LHC clock.
-
Brian highlighted the difficulty of synchronizing different readout systems->no coincidence trigger between on- and off-axis detectors.
-
-
Software Calibration and Saturation
-
Current calibration is preliminary?; need precise? calibration for SIPM saturation.
-
Possible need to extend dynamic range due to saturation effects.
-
-
Overall Considerations and Risks
-
Jamie emphasized significant learning opportunities from 2026 installation despite potential technical limitations.
-
Clear communication on Installation feasibility is essential.
-
Jamie's Main Concerns
-
Precise detector dimensions critical due to transport limitations (maximum width: 110 cm).
-
Necessity for mechanical support ensuring detector alignment parallel to neutrino beamline on inclined floor.
-
Integration and synchronization complexities between detector and additional veto scintillator systems.
-
Importance of including LHC clock signals for accurate event timing.
-
Clarification required on the feasibility of trigger adjustments and potential firmware complexities.
Action and Checkpoints
-
Obtain and confirm exact detector dimensions and weight details for transportation feasibility.
-
Define and evaluate a fiducial volume for accurate PID analysis and energy containment.
-
Clarify and investigate synchronization methods for additional veto scintillator readout with the existing detector system.
-
Confirm feasibility of including LHC clock and orbit signals into the detector readout system.
-
-
07:00
→
07:20