-
John Pedersen (CERN)07/03/2012, 09:15What news from SAPOCO on new version of Safety Policy? Recent changes in Safety Organization; Confirmation of Director A&T as “Chef d’Installation”; single BFSP transformed into three CSAP’s, one per complex: LHC, SPS, PS. What impact does this have on Safety for different facilities (machines and experimental areas)? What are the existing and recognised roles and functions for both...Go to contribution page
-
Sebastien Evrard (CERN)07/03/2012, 09:45Safety documentation as seen by different stakeholders (HSE, project office, Safety Officers, BE Safety Unit) and from different viewpoints (conceptual, methodical, goal-based…); there are many different initiatives and strong opinions... Safety Documentation should primarily be a crucial working-tool for all participants in a project or for personnel involved in the operation and...Go to contribution page
-
Steve Hutchins (CERN)07/03/2012, 10:15We have at CERN over 25 beam and experimental facilities, access to which is controlled by “access zones” of which there are 152 (these also include other areas such as key cabinets and the CCC kitchen). Each zone can have training and personal safety equipment requirements set in function of the hazards that may be present, but in practice the hazards are similar in many facilities. Our aim...Go to contribution page
-
Ana-Paula Bernardes (CERN)07/03/2012, 11:15Some tools have been in place to formalize the activities around the ALARA principle for a few years now; most notably the requirement for a Dossier d’Intervention en Milieu Radioactif (DIMR). Review the recent change in the criteria to trigger and categorize the DIMR. Can we have a comparison of the points of view of Management, Radiation Protection and Users on this change, and on the ALARA...Go to contribution page
-
Luca Bruno (CERN)07/03/2012, 11:45Review the motivation and objectives of a traceability system, taking from internal motivation, industry standards and regulatory requirements on our partners in recycling industries and final repositories. Review of the existing system and procedure for traceability of equipment and materials, with presentation of the TREC tool, as seen by users currently using the system, ie presentation of...Go to contribution page
-
Luisa Ulrici (CERN)07/03/2012, 12:15Once equipment and materials are declared radioactive waste, they follow a very strict procedure before final elimination can be reached. Obviously we should minimize radioactive waste but do we understand why? Presentation of major issues at stake; money is one, others are regulations and additional burden, but also publicity and “good neighbour” attitude. Traceability of waste is treated in...Go to contribution page
-
Roland Garoby (CERN)07/03/2012, 14:00Beam characteristics for HL-LHC [protons and ions (as far as possible)] Time evolution (baseline plan): between LS1 and LS2, after LS2 Impact on other users.Go to contribution page
-
Alessandra Lombardi (CERN)07/03/2012, 14:30Update on Linac4 status and planning up to beam commissioning Scenarios of connection: baseline plan, alternative scenarios (emergency replacement of Linac2 or Connection to PSB delayed to LS2, Benefits/drawbacks of having LS1.5)Go to contribution page
-
Dr Klaus Hanke (CERN)07/03/2012, 15:00List of actions and planning of implementation (H- Injection, 2.0 GeV extraction…) Studies Impact on other users PSB performance for LHC and other users in the different scenarios Potential risksGo to contribution page
-
Dr Simone Gilardoni (CERN)07/03/2012, 16:00List of actions and planning of implementation Studies Impact on other users PS performance for LHC and other users in the different scenarios Potential risksGo to contribution page
-
Dr Brennan Goddard (CERN)07/03/2012, 16:30List of actions and planning of implementation Studies Impact on other users SPS performance for LHC and other users in the different scenarios Potential risksGo to contribution page
-
Django Manglunki (CERN)07/03/2012, 17:00List of actions and planning of implementation Studies Impact on other users Performance for LHC and other users in the different scenarios Potential risksGo to contribution page
-
Massimo Giovannozzi08/03/2012, 09:00Status and outlook for 2012 What can (needs to) be done before LS1 Impact of studies and commissioning on classical CT or other hardwareGo to contribution page
-
Frank Tecker (CERN)08/03/2012, 09:30Status and plans What in 2012?Go to contribution page
-
Gabriel Metral (CERN)08/03/2012, 10:00Can a super cycle be optimized with respect to losses ? Ways to optimize losses/fluxGo to contribution page
-
Lau Gatignon (CERN)08/03/2012, 11:00Compass +NA62 running together + other future experimentsGo to contribution page
-
Django Manglunki (CERN)08/03/2012, 11:30Future beams for LHC FT beams: primary beam interlock status, de-bunching, etc. Radiation hazard with new ion species (all machines)Go to contribution page
-
Rende Steerenberg (CERN)08/03/2012, 12:00Impact of LHC beams on global loss budget in PSB, PS and SPS Impact of LHC filling on other programs (ISOLDE, n-TOF, EA, NA, CNGS) Stability of booster rings Splitting (stability)Go to contribution page
-
Lau Gatignon (CERN)08/03/2012, 14:00Outcome of the East Area Day: - Updated user requests - New (final) layout in view of DIRAC dismantling - Irradiation facility in view of AIDA project - Project structure, cost, schedule, plans for LS1 North Area renovation: - Status of the renovation activities: EL, CV, magnets - Schedule and foreseen activities during LS1 - Priority list to assure operations and restart in 2014Go to contribution page
-
Sebastien Evrard (CERN)08/03/2012, 14:30- Planned works for TAX repair - Other activities in the caverns: targets, splitters, infrastructure improvements - Where do we stand in terms of operations for 2012? Critical items? - List of activities for LS1 in view of operation in 2014Go to contribution page
-
Mr Stephan Maury (CERN)08/03/2012, 15:00- ELENA project status and plans - Consolidation project for AD (machine) and hall. What is done in 2011 and plans/activities for 2012. - Status of the AD target consolidationGo to contribution page
-
Dr Brennan Goddard (CERN)08/03/2012, 16:00- Plasma Wakefield acceleration: new beam line and experimental area in TT61/West Area - Neutrino facilities under study in LAGUNA-LBNO - New short-baseline neutrino beam in PS or SPS - Status and plans, impact to existing machines and experimental areasGo to contribution page
-
Enrico Chiaveri (CEA - Centre d'Etudes de Saclay (FR))08/03/2012, 16:30- Design of new area - Timeline of activitiesGo to contribution page
-
Richard Catherall (CERN)08/03/2012, 17:00- Status and plans for 2012 experiments - HIE-ISOLDE status and plans - Foreseen activities for LS1Go to contribution page
-
David Mcfarlane (CERN)09/03/2012, 09:00Booster, PS, AD, SPS Planning must take into account that in some cases the same teams will be working on the LHC as well as the SPS.Go to contribution page
-
Dr Vinod Chohan (CERN)09/03/2012, 09:40LINAC3? CTF3? LINAC4 commissioning? (check on ISOLDE stable beam run??) What services must be available and when in order for them to run?Go to contribution page
-
Eva Sanchez-Corral Mena (CERN)09/03/2012, 10:00Planning for the project and how access will be handled while the work is being doneGo to contribution page
-
Dr Erk Jensen (CERN)09/03/2012, 11:00PS and SPS Complex: What is to be done?, Why do we need to do it?, What are the requirements from other groups and priorities for: i) Maintenance work ii) Consolidation iii) Upgrade related workGo to contribution page
-
Jeremie Bauche (CERN)09/03/2012, 11:30What is to be done? Why do we need to do it? What are the requirements from other groups and priorities for: i) Maintenance activities ii) Replacing week/faulty SPS magnets iii) Installing magnets with coated vacuum chambers in the SPSGo to contribution page
-
Laurent Ducimetiere (CERN)09/03/2012, 12:00What is to be done? Why do we need to do it? What are the requirements from other groups and priorities for: i) Maintenance work ii) Consolidation iii) Upgrade related workGo to contribution page
-
Jose Antonio Ferreira Somoza (CERN)09/03/2012, 14:00What is to be done? Why do we need to do it? What are the requirements from other groups and priorities for: I) Maintenance work II) Consolidation III) Upgrade related work IV) List of activities generated by other groupsGo to contribution page
-
Dominique Missiaen (CERN)09/03/2012, 14:30What is to be done? Why do we need to do it? What are the requirements from other groups and priorities for: I) Maintenance work II) Consolidation III) Upgrade related work IV) List of activities generated by other groupsGo to contribution page
-
Gilles Le Godec (CERN), Karsten Kahle (CERN)09/03/2012, 15:00What is to be done? Why do we need to do it? What are the requirements from other groups and priorities for: I) Maintenance work II) Consolidation III) Upgrade related workGo to contribution page
-
Michele Battistin (CERN)09/03/2012, 16:00What is to be done? Why do we need to do it? What are the requirements from other groups and priorities for: i) Maintenance work ii) Consolidation iii) Upgrade related work iv) List of activities generated by other groupsGo to contribution page
-
Francois Duval (CERN)09/03/2012, 16:30What is to be done? Why do we need to do it? What are the requirements from other groups and priorities for: i) Maintenance work ii) Consolidation iii) Upgrade related work iv) List of activities generated by other groupsGo to contribution page
-
Daniel Ricci (CERN)09/03/2012, 17:00What is to be done? Why do we need to do it? What are the requirements from other groups and priorities for: i) New Installations ii) Cabling clean-up in SPS (and PSB?)Go to contribution page
-
-
Choose timezone
Your profile timezone: