7–9 Mar 2012
CERN
Europe/Zurich timezone

Contribution List

38 out of 38 displayed
Export to PDF
  1. John Pedersen (CERN)
    07/03/2012, 09:15
    What news from SAPOCO on new version of Safety Policy? Recent changes in Safety Organization; Confirmation of Director A&T as “Chef d’Installation”; single BFSP transformed into three CSAP’s, one per complex: LHC, SPS, PS. What impact does this have on Safety for different facilities (machines and experimental areas)? What are the existing and recognised roles and functions for both...
    Go to contribution page
  2. Sebastien Evrard (CERN)
    07/03/2012, 09:45
    Safety documentation as seen by different stakeholders (HSE, project office, Safety Officers, BE Safety Unit) and from different viewpoints (conceptual, methodical, goal-based…); there are many different initiatives and strong opinions... Safety Documentation should primarily be a crucial working-tool for all participants in a project or for personnel involved in the operation and...
    Go to contribution page
  3. Steve Hutchins (CERN)
    07/03/2012, 10:15
    We have at CERN over 25 beam and experimental facilities, access to which is controlled by “access zones” of which there are 152 (these also include other areas such as key cabinets and the CCC kitchen). Each zone can have training and personal safety equipment requirements set in function of the hazards that may be present, but in practice the hazards are similar in many facilities. Our aim...
    Go to contribution page
  4. Ana-Paula Bernardes (CERN)
    07/03/2012, 11:15
    Some tools have been in place to formalize the activities around the ALARA principle for a few years now; most notably the requirement for a Dossier d’Intervention en Milieu Radioactif (DIMR). Review the recent change in the criteria to trigger and categorize the DIMR. Can we have a comparison of the points of view of Management, Radiation Protection and Users on this change, and on the ALARA...
    Go to contribution page
  5. Luca Bruno (CERN)
    07/03/2012, 11:45
    Review the motivation and objectives of a traceability system, taking from internal motivation, industry standards and regulatory requirements on our partners in recycling industries and final repositories. Review of the existing system and procedure for traceability of equipment and materials, with presentation of the TREC tool, as seen by users currently using the system, ie presentation of...
    Go to contribution page
  6. Luisa Ulrici (CERN)
    07/03/2012, 12:15
    Once equipment and materials are declared radioactive waste, they follow a very strict procedure before final elimination can be reached. Obviously we should minimize radioactive waste but do we understand why? Presentation of major issues at stake; money is one, others are regulations and additional burden, but also publicity and “good neighbour” attitude. Traceability of waste is treated in...
    Go to contribution page
  7. Roland Garoby (CERN)
    07/03/2012, 14:00
    Beam characteristics for HL-LHC [protons and ions (as far as possible)] Time evolution (baseline plan): between LS1 and LS2, after LS2 Impact on other users.
    Go to contribution page
  8. Alessandra Lombardi (CERN)
    07/03/2012, 14:30
    Update on Linac4 status and planning up to beam commissioning Scenarios of connection: baseline plan, alternative scenarios (emergency replacement of Linac2 or Connection to PSB delayed to LS2, Benefits/drawbacks of having LS1.5)
    Go to contribution page
  9. Dr Klaus Hanke (CERN)
    07/03/2012, 15:00
    List of actions and planning of implementation (H- Injection, 2.0 GeV extraction…) Studies Impact on other users PSB performance for LHC and other users in the different scenarios Potential risks
    Go to contribution page
  10. Dr Simone Gilardoni (CERN)
    07/03/2012, 16:00
    List of actions and planning of implementation Studies Impact on other users PS performance for LHC and other users in the different scenarios Potential risks
    Go to contribution page
  11. Dr Brennan Goddard (CERN)
    07/03/2012, 16:30
    List of actions and planning of implementation Studies Impact on other users SPS performance for LHC and other users in the different scenarios Potential risks
    Go to contribution page
  12. Django Manglunki (CERN)
    07/03/2012, 17:00
    List of actions and planning of implementation Studies Impact on other users Performance for LHC and other users in the different scenarios Potential risks
    Go to contribution page
  13. Massimo Giovannozzi
    08/03/2012, 09:00
    Status and outlook for 2012 What can (needs to) be done before LS1 Impact of studies and commissioning on classical CT or other hardware
    Go to contribution page
  14. Frank Tecker (CERN)
    08/03/2012, 09:30
    Status and plans What in 2012?
    Go to contribution page
  15. Gabriel Metral (CERN)
    08/03/2012, 10:00
    Can a super cycle be optimized with respect to losses ? Ways to optimize losses/flux
    Go to contribution page
  16. Lau Gatignon (CERN)
    08/03/2012, 11:00
    Compass +NA62 running together + other future experiments
    Go to contribution page
  17. Django Manglunki (CERN)
    08/03/2012, 11:30
    Future beams for LHC FT beams: primary beam interlock status, de-bunching, etc. Radiation hazard with new ion species (all machines)
    Go to contribution page
  18. Rende Steerenberg (CERN)
    08/03/2012, 12:00
    Impact of LHC beams on global loss budget in PSB, PS and SPS Impact of LHC filling on other programs (ISOLDE, n-TOF, EA, NA, CNGS) Stability of booster rings Splitting (stability)
    Go to contribution page
  19. Lau Gatignon (CERN)
    08/03/2012, 14:00
    Outcome of the East Area Day: - Updated user requests - New (final) layout in view of DIRAC dismantling - Irradiation facility in view of AIDA project - Project structure, cost, schedule, plans for LS1 North Area renovation: - Status of the renovation activities: EL, CV, magnets - Schedule and foreseen activities during LS1 - Priority list to assure operations and restart in 2014
    Go to contribution page
  20. Sebastien Evrard (CERN)
    08/03/2012, 14:30
    - Planned works for TAX repair - Other activities in the caverns: targets, splitters, infrastructure improvements - Where do we stand in terms of operations for 2012? Critical items? - List of activities for LS1 in view of operation in 2014
    Go to contribution page
  21. Mr Stephan Maury (CERN)
    08/03/2012, 15:00
    - ELENA project status and plans - Consolidation project for AD (machine) and hall. What is done in 2011 and plans/activities for 2012. - Status of the AD target consolidation
    Go to contribution page
  22. Dr Brennan Goddard (CERN)
    08/03/2012, 16:00
    - Plasma Wakefield acceleration: new beam line and experimental area in TT61/West Area - Neutrino facilities under study in LAGUNA-LBNO - New short-baseline neutrino beam in PS or SPS - Status and plans, impact to existing machines and experimental areas
    Go to contribution page
  23. Enrico Chiaveri (CEA - Centre d'Etudes de Saclay (FR))
    08/03/2012, 16:30
    - Design of new area - Timeline of activities
    Go to contribution page
  24. Richard Catherall (CERN)
    08/03/2012, 17:00
    - Status and plans for 2012 experiments - HIE-ISOLDE status and plans - Foreseen activities for LS1
    Go to contribution page
  25. David Mcfarlane (CERN)
    09/03/2012, 09:00
    Booster, PS, AD, SPS Planning must take into account that in some cases the same teams will be working on the LHC as well as the SPS.
    Go to contribution page
  26. Dr Vinod Chohan (CERN)
    09/03/2012, 09:40
    LINAC3? CTF3? LINAC4 commissioning? (check on ISOLDE stable beam run??) What services must be available and when in order for them to run?
    Go to contribution page
  27. Eva Sanchez-Corral Mena (CERN)
    09/03/2012, 10:00
    Planning for the project and how access will be handled while the work is being done
    Go to contribution page
  28. Dr Erk Jensen (CERN)
    09/03/2012, 11:00
    PS and SPS Complex: What is to be done?, Why do we need to do it?, What are the requirements from other groups and priorities for: i) Maintenance work ii) Consolidation iii) Upgrade related work
    Go to contribution page
  29. Jeremie Bauche (CERN)
    09/03/2012, 11:30
    What is to be done? Why do we need to do it? What are the requirements from other groups and priorities for: i) Maintenance activities ii) Replacing week/faulty SPS magnets iii) Installing magnets with coated vacuum chambers in the SPS
    Go to contribution page
  30. Laurent Ducimetiere (CERN)
    09/03/2012, 12:00
    What is to be done? Why do we need to do it? What are the requirements from other groups and priorities for: i) Maintenance work ii) Consolidation iii) Upgrade related work
    Go to contribution page
  31. Jose Antonio Ferreira Somoza (CERN)
    09/03/2012, 14:00
    What is to be done? Why do we need to do it? What are the requirements from other groups and priorities for: I) Maintenance work II) Consolidation III) Upgrade related work IV) List of activities generated by other groups
    Go to contribution page
  32. Dominique Missiaen (CERN)
    09/03/2012, 14:30
    What is to be done? Why do we need to do it? What are the requirements from other groups and priorities for: I) Maintenance work II) Consolidation III) Upgrade related work IV) List of activities generated by other groups
    Go to contribution page
  33. Gilles Le Godec (CERN), Karsten Kahle (CERN)
    09/03/2012, 15:00
    What is to be done? Why do we need to do it? What are the requirements from other groups and priorities for: I) Maintenance work II) Consolidation III) Upgrade related work
    Go to contribution page
  34. Michele Battistin (CERN)
    09/03/2012, 16:00
    What is to be done? Why do we need to do it? What are the requirements from other groups and priorities for: i) Maintenance work ii) Consolidation iii) Upgrade related work iv) List of activities generated by other groups
    Go to contribution page
  35. Francois Duval (CERN)
    09/03/2012, 16:30
    What is to be done? Why do we need to do it? What are the requirements from other groups and priorities for: i) Maintenance work ii) Consolidation iii) Upgrade related work iv) List of activities generated by other groups
    Go to contribution page
  36. Daniel Ricci (CERN)
    09/03/2012, 17:00
    What is to be done? Why do we need to do it? What are the requirements from other groups and priorities for: i) New Installations ii) Cabling clean-up in SPS (and PSB?)
    Go to contribution page