Login

CLICdp Detector Optimisation Meeting

→ Europe/Zurich
6/2-004 (CERN)

6/2-004

CERN

40
Show room on map
Description
apologies: A. Herve, H. ten Kate, U. Uggerhoj
direct link to webex
Hide

Decisions taken at this meeting:

1) The HCAL barrel absorber material for the new CLIC detector model is steel. (Further optimisation might lead to a reduced outer radius of the HCAL barrel - e.g. one might be able to have fewer layers keeping the overall depth of the calorimeter).

2) The solenoid magnetic field for the new CLIC detector model is 4 T. (It was mentioned that the aspect ratio of the solenoid is not favourable to achieve a homogeneous field - making the solenoid a bit longer would not be a huge technical issue. Conflicts with other design ingredients (related to the L*) might however appear.

There are minutes attached to this event. Show them.
    • 1
      Introduction
    • 2
      HCAL discussion: Steel vs. Tungsten
      • a) Summary of recent work in Cambridge
        versions of an ILD detector with 5.7 lambda HCAL: steel vs. tungsten
        Speaker: Steven Green (University of Cambridge (GB))
        Slides
      • b) Summary of recent work at CERN
        versions of an ILD detector with 7.5 lambda HCAL: steel vs. tungsten
        Speaker: Nikiforos Nikiforou (CERN)
        Slides
      • c) Discussion
        Comparison Steve / Nikiforos by Mark
        Slides
    • 3
      HCAL discussion: radius and number of layers, cost and solenoid
      HCAL barrel costs
      magnet system costs
    • 4
      B-field discussion
      • a) Summary of B-field variations
        Speaker: Rosa Simoniello (CERN)
        Slides
      • b) Discussion
    • 5
      A.O.B.
Powered by Indico v3.3.7-pre