6โ€“8 Sept 2006
ETH Zurich
Europe/Zurich timezone

Contribution List

43 out of 43 displayed
Export to PDF
  1. Joey Huston (Michigan)
    06/09/2006, 09:00
  2. Bryan Webber (Cambridge)
    06/09/2006, 09:40
  3. David Kosower (Saclay)
    06/09/2006, 10:05
  4. Giulia Zanderighi (CERN)
    06/09/2006, 11:00
  5. Giampiero Passarino (Torino)
    06/09/2006, 11:25
    Even disregarding the intrinsic necessity of some new algorithm for numerical evaluation of one-loop diagrams, and even in case it has no intrinsic necessity at all, a probable decision about its goodness is possible inductively by studying its success. Success here means fruitfulness in consequences, in particular in verifiable consequences, i.e., consequences demonstrable without the...
    Go to contribution page
  6. Ansgar Denner (PSI Zurich)
    06/09/2006, 11:50
    The decay of the Standard Model Higgs boson into four fermions via a virtual W-boson or Z-boson pair is one of the most important decay modes in the Higgs-boson search at the LHC. We present a calculation of the first order radiative corrections to these processes, including higher order improvements. The intermediate W- and Z-boson resonances are consistently described using the...
    Go to contribution page
  7. David Soper (Oregon)
    06/09/2006, 14:00
  8. Stefan Weinzierl (Mainz)
    06/09/2006, 14:25
    I will discuss various technical aspects related to automated QCD calculations at NLO: - the recursive calculation of amplitudes, - the organization of the colour structures, - the automated generation of subtraction terms, - the numerical tensor reduction of loop integrals.
    Go to contribution page
  9. Ruth Britto (Amsterdam)
    06/09/2006, 14:50
  10. Gabriele Travaglini (Queen Mary)
    06/09/2006, 15:35
  11. William Kilgore (Brookhaven)
    06/09/2006, 16:00
    I describe a parton-level Monte Carlo calculation of Drell-Yan production at next-to-next-to-leading order. The calculation is performed with a subtraction scheme in which the subtraction term is the squared matrix element itself.
    Go to contribution page
  12. Thomas Gehrmann (Uni Zurich)
    06/09/2006, 16:25
  13. Roberto Pittau (Torino)
    06/09/2006, 17:10
    We show how to extract the coefficients of the 4-, 3-, 2- and 1-point one-loop scalar integrals from the full one-loop amplitude of arbitrary scattering processes. In a similar fashion, also the rational terms can be derived. Basically no information on the analytical structure of the amplitude is required, making our method appealing for an efficient numerical implementation.
    Go to contribution page
  14. Michael Spira (PSI)
    06/09/2006, 17:35
    The loop-induced processes gg -> h,H,A provide the dominant Higgs boson production mechanisms at the Tevatron and LHC in a large range of the minimal supersymmetric extension of the Standard Model. For squark masses below ~400 GeV squark loop contributions become important in addition to the top and bottom quark loops. The two-loop QCD corrections to the squark contributions of these...
    Go to contribution page
  15. Carlo Oleari (Bicocca, Milano)
    06/09/2006, 18:00
  16. Guenther Dissertori (ETH Zurich)
    07/09/2006, 09:00
    After a very brief report on the status of the LHC preparations (machine and detectors) I will try to summarize the current understanding of how well specific hard scattering processes can be measured at the LHC, and what the relevance of these measurements is. Examples are the Drell-Yan process, top production, W/Z + jet as well as inclusive jet production.
    Go to contribution page
  17. W. James Stirling (Durham)
    07/09/2006, 09:40
  18. Lance Dixon (SLAC)
    07/09/2006, 10:05
    Resummation of soft-gluon exchange for QCD hard scattering requires an anomalous dimension matrix in color space. We compute this matrix directly for arbitrary massless processes for the first time at two loops, and show that it is proportional to the one-loop matrix. This result reproduces the 1/eps pole terms in previous explicit two-loop computations, and predicts such terms for...
    Go to contribution page
  19. Sven Moch (DESY Zeuthen)
    07/09/2006, 11:00
  20. Giuseppe Marchesini (Bicocca, Milano)
    07/09/2006, 11:25
  21. Paolo Nason (Bicocca, Milano)
    07/09/2006, 11:50
  22. Stefan Dittmaier (MPI, Munich)
    07/09/2006, 14:00
    In the calculation of NLO corrections to multi-leg processes serious numerical problems arise in the commonly used Passarino-Veltman reduction of tensor to scalar integrals in exceptional phase-space configurations. In this talk two alternative methods are discussed solving this problem. One of the methods relies on a seminumerical approach, in which a specific tensor coefficient is...
    Go to contribution page
  23. Dieter Zeppenfeld (Karlsruhe)
    07/09/2006, 14:25
  24. Costas Papadopoulos (Demokritos Athens)
    07/09/2006, 14:50
  25. Peter Uwer (CERN)
    07/09/2006, 15:35
  26. Daniel de Florian (Buenos Aires)
    07/09/2006, 16:00
    We perform the all-order resummation of large logarithmic(NLL) QCD corrections for the process pp ->H+ X when the Higgs boson H is produced at high transverse momentum.
    Go to contribution page
  27. Thomas Binoth (Edinburgh)
    07/09/2006, 16:25
    In this talk I review the status of our GOLEM project. The acronym stands for "General One-Loop Evaluator of Matrix-elements". This tool is designed to allow for an efficient and numerically stable evaluation of multi-particle one-loop amplitudes which are needed for the precise description of numerous processes relevant for the upcoming LHC. First applications are presented.
    Go to contribution page
  28. Massimiliano Grazzini (INFN, Firenze)
    07/09/2006, 17:10
  29. Tilman Plehn (Edinburgh)
    07/09/2006, 17:35
    Madgraph and Madevent are a well established tool to evaluate tree-level amplitudes and create unweighted events for processes with a large number of external particles at the LHC. For the Madgraph collaboration I review the status, some physics complications and recent calculations of Madgraph/Madevent for physics beyond the Standard Model.
    Go to contribution page
  30. Alex Pomarol (Barcelona)
    08/09/2006, 09:00
  31. Walter Giele (Fermilab)
    08/09/2006, 09:40
  32. Stefano Catani (INFN, Firenze)
    08/09/2006, 10:05
  33. Nigel Glover (Durham)
    08/09/2006, 11:00
    We discuss how the twistor inspired methods can be used to derive compact expressions for multi-parton amplitudes involving Higgs bosons (in the limit that the top quark mass is heavy producing an effective Higgs-gluon interaction).
    Go to contribution page
  34. Andreas Brandhuber (Queen Mary)
    08/09/2006, 11:25
  35. Bo Feng (Imperial College)
    08/09/2006, 11:50
  36. Darren Forde (Saclay)
    08/09/2006, 14:00
    I will discuss the construction of amplitudes at one-loop in QCD using the unitarity bootstrap approach. I will detail the techniques needed to build the rational contributions to these amplitudes as well as highlighting not only their application to fixed-multiplicity amplitudes but also to all-multiplicity amplitudes.
    Go to contribution page
  37. Chuan-jie Zhu (Beijing)
    08/09/2006, 14:25
  38. Alexander Mitov (DESY Zeuthen)
    08/09/2006, 14:50
  39. Vittorio del Duca (INFN, Torino)
    08/09/2006, 15:35
  40. Gabor Somogyi (Debrecen)
    08/09/2006, 16:00
  41. David Dunbar (Swansea)
    08/09/2006, 16:25
    The recent progress for calculating gauge theory amplitudes may also be applied to gravity calculations. We find surprising similarities between the perturbative expansions of maximally supersymmetric Yang-Mills and gravity theories. We discuss possible implications of these results for the UV behaviour of supergravity in D=4.
    Go to contribution page
  42. Zvi Bern (UCLA)
    08/09/2006, 17:10
  43. Roberto Pittau (Torino)
    We show how to extract the coefficients of the 4-, 3-, 2- and 1-point one-loop scalar integrals from the full one-loop amplitude of arbitrary scattering processes. In a similar fashion, also the rational terms can be derived. Basically no information on the analytical structure of the amplitude is required, making our method appealing for an efficient numerical implementation
    Go to contribution page

Back to the event