Possible indications for new Higgs bosons in the reach of the LHC: N2HDM and NMSSM interpretations

23 Aug 2021, 13:30
20m
ZR1

ZR1

Searches for the BSM Physics at the LHC and Future Hadronic Colliders Searches for the BSM Physics at the LHC and Future Hadronic Colliders

Speaker

Thomas Biekoetter (Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY)

Description

In several searches for additional Higgs bosons at the LHC,
in particular the CMS search in the·
$pp \to \phi \to t \bar t$ channel and the ATLAS search in·
the $pp \to \phi \to \tau^+\tau^-$
channel, a local excess at
the level of $3\,\sigma$ or above has been observed·
at a mass scale of $m_\phi \approx 400$GeV.·
We investigate to what extent a possible signal in those
channels could be accommodated in the·
Next-to-Two-Higgs-Doublet Model (N2HDM) or the Next-to Minimal
Supersymmetric Standard Model (NMSSM).
In a second step we furthermore analyse
whether such a model could be compatible with both a signal at·
$\approx 400$GeV and at $\approx 96$GeV, where the latter possibility is
motivated by observed excesses in searches for the $b \bar b$ final state at·
LEP and the di-photon final state at CMS.
The analysis for the N2HDM reveals that the
observed excesses at $\approx 400$GeV in the
$pp \to \phi \to t \bar t$ and
$pp \to \phi \to \tau^+\tau^-$ channels point
towards different regions of the parameter space, while one such excess and an
additional Higgs boson at $\approx 96$GeV could simultaneously be
accommodated. In the context of the NMSSM·
an experimental confirmation of a signal in the·
$t \bar t$ final state would favour·
the alignment-without-decoupling limit of the model,
where the Higgs boson at $\approx 125$GeV could be essentially
indistinguishable from the Higgs boson of the SM.·
In contrast,·
a signal in the $\tau^+\tau^-$ channel would be correlated with significant
deviations of the properties of the Higgs boson at $\approx 125$GeV·
from the ones of a SM Higgs boson that could be detected with high-precision
coupling measurements.

Authors

Alexander Josef Grohsjean (Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (DE)) Thomas Biekoetter (Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY) Christian Schwanenberger (Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (DE)) Georg Ralf Weiglein (Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (DE)) Sven Heinemeyer (CSIC (Madrid, ES))

Presentation materials