- Compact style
- Indico style
- Indico style - inline minutes
- Indico style - numbered
- Indico style - numbered + minutes
- Indico Weeks View
https://tinyurl.com/T1-GGUS-Open
https://tinyurl.com/T1-GGUS-Closed
https://lcgwww.gridpp.rl.ac.uk/utils/availchart/
https://cms-site-readiness.web.cern.ch/cms-site-readiness/SiteReadiness/HTML/SiteReadinessReport.html#T1_UK_RAL
http://hammercloud.cern.ch/hc/app/atlas/siteoverview/?site=RAL-LCG2&startTime=2020-01-29&endTime=2020-02-06&templateType=isGolden
Jobs: I see a period between 17/03/22 and 03/04/22 which is dominated by offsite reading jobs. The efficiency of these jobs is between 50 and 75%, which seems pretty good. I'd need to do a more detailed analysis between particular campaigns running on different sites and also pulling the data from offsite to check if we are 'as good' at this as other sites, but the evidence so far is promising.
Webdav: James W made some code changes and rolled them out. From Sunday until now the SAM tests are green, which is good, although the traffic with Echo as source has been relatively light. Today's traffic looks higher so could be a better test.
Antares: We may have understood the problem where files are successfully transferred to Antares, and even written to tape, but not acknowledged by Rucio. I previously wondered if this was a problem of communication between FTS and Rucio, since transfers were appearing in FTS monitoring but not Rucio (neither successful nor failed). But George tells me that an example file we investigated had written to tape on the day the request was submitted. There is then supposed to be a signal to tell EOS that this has happened...but he saw no evidence of this. So there is now an RT ticket for this. (Rucio will not acknowledge a completed transfer until the file confirms it is physically written to tape, since CMS started using the 'check on tape' functionality.)