17–23 Aug 2025
California Institute of Technology
US/Pacific timezone

Session

Unfolding & Inference

20 Aug 2025, 14:00
CHEN100 (California Institute of Technology)

CHEN100

California Institute of Technology

1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, California

Conveners

Unfolding & Inference

  • Eilam Gross (Weizmann Institute of Science (IL))

Unfolding & Inference

  • Aishik Ghosh (University of California Irvine (US))

Presentation materials

There are no materials yet.

  1. Oz Amram (Fermi National Accelerator Lab. (US))
    20/08/2025, 14:00

    Crucial to many measurements at the LHC is the use of correlated multi-dimensional information to distinguish rare processes from large backgrounds.
    Since the rise of machine learning in the last decade, it is now standard for analyses to employ multivariate classifiers trained on simulation to distinguish signal and background. Such classifiers significantly increase the statistical power...

    Go to contribution page
  2. Mariel Pettee (Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (US))
    20/08/2025, 14:20

    Traditional approaches to precise Standard Model (SM) measurements of fundamental particles at the LHC generally restrict the format of these results to just one or two properties at a time in predetermined histogram bins. The ATLAS Experiment recently published such a measurement in a notable new format for LHC experiments: high-dimensional and unbinned datasets that can be used for a wide...

    Go to contribution page
  3. Daohan Wang (HEPHY ÖAW)
    20/08/2025, 14:40

    We present a graph-neural-network (GNN) framework that delivers precise extractions of the Higgs-boson signal strength while coherently propagating systematic uncertainties. The architecture combines a deterministic branch, which processes kinematic features immune to nuisance parameters, with an uncertainty-aware branch that ingests systematics-modulated inputs and applies gated-attention...

    Go to contribution page
  4. Sean Benevedes (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
    20/08/2025, 15:00

    Neural ratio estimation provides a means of performing frequentist simulation-based inference (SBI), but uncertainties on the estimated ratios of probability densities must be taken into account in order to yield reliable confidence intervals on the inferred parameters. We examine the role of these uncertainties on estimated density ratios in the context of the FAIR Universe HiggsML...

    Go to contribution page
  5. Kevin Thomas Greif (University of California Irvine (US))
    21/08/2025, 14:10

    In most measurements in particle physics, correcting for the imperfect resolution of the detector used to observe the events is a necessary step to extract a parameter of interest. This can be done through forward folding, in which the theoretical predictions are adjusted by running a simulation of the detector, or through unfolding, in which detector effects are removed from the experimental...

    Go to contribution page
  6. Sascha Diefenbacher (Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (US))
    21/08/2025, 14:30

    Most of the fundamental, emergent, and phenomenological parameters of particle and nuclear physics are determined through parametric template fits. Simulations are used to populate histograms which are then matched to data. This approach is inherently lossy, since histograms are binned and low-dimensional. Deep learning has enabled unbinned and high-dimensional parameter estimation through...

    Go to contribution page
  7. James Carzon (Carnegie Mellon University)
    21/08/2025, 14:50

    Particle physics experiments rely on the (generalised) likelihood ratio test (LRT) for searches and measurements. This is not guaranteed to be optimal for composite hypothesis tests, as the Neyman-Pearson lemma pertains only to simple hypothesis tests. An improvement in the core statistical testing methodology would have widespread ramifications across experiments. We discuss an alternate test...

    Go to contribution page
  8. Alkaid Cheng (University of Wisconsin Madison (US))
    21/08/2025, 15:10

    Statistical inference in physics is often based on samples (from a `forward model') that emulate experimental data and depend on parameters of the underlying theory. Modern machine learning has supercharged this workflow to enable high-dimensional and unbinned analyses to utilize much more information than ever before. We propose a general framework for describing the integration of machine...

    Go to contribution page
Building timetable...