Login

CERN Workshop on Innovations in Scholarly Communication (OAI9)

17–19 Jun 2015
Graduate Institute & Campus Biotech (University of Geneva)
Europe/Zurich timezone

Support

Session

Plenary 4

18 Jun 2015, 13:45
Graduate Institute & Campus Biotech (University of Geneva)

Graduate Institute & Campus Biotech (University of Geneva)

Maison de la paix Chemin Eugène-Rigot 2 & Chemin des Mines 9 1202 Geneva 46.222172, 6.148243

Conveners

Plenary 4: Quality assurance

  • Frank Scholze (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology)

Presentation materials

There are no materials yet.

  1. 26. Quality Assurance Session: Managing peer review at a large scale
    Mr Damian Pattinson (PLOS)
    18/06/2015, 13:45
    Since its launch seven years ago, PLOS ONE has broken all records of growth and scale, becoming the largest journal in the world within just five years. The journal now receives thousands of submissions each month, and publishes over 600 new research articles every week. Despite this scale, the journal has managed to maintain a high standard of quality and rigour, by using a combination of...
    Go to contribution page
  2. 27. Quality Assurance Session: Peerage of Science - community driven initiative to improve peer-review
    Dr Janne-Tuomas Seppänen (University of Jyväskylä)
    18/06/2015, 14:20
    In this talk I will discuss the two "foundation stones" of the Peerage of Science. 1) Peer judgement and scoring of the peer reviews. The academic community, and the publishing industry, need to have the courage to say out loud that the quality of peer review contributions varies considerably, and so act accordingly. Only then can we begin to give academic recognition for excellence in peer...
    Go to contribution page
  3. 28. Quality Assurance Session: Publons - credit for peer review
    Mr Andrew Preston
    18/06/2015, 14:55
    In this presentation I will introduce Publons.com and describe how researchers use the service to build and verify their peer review record. I will also outline the tools we provide to help editors to find and contact reviewers. This is all part of our mission to speed up science by improving the peer review process.
    Go to contribution page
Building timetable...