-
Frank Zimmermann29/01/2010, 08:30The parameters available (intensities, betas, crossing angles), the relationship between them, the constraints and challenges for each parameter, the possible ranges that could be explored, and different optimization strategies.Go to contribution page
-
Ralph Assmann29/01/2010, 08:55One route to higher performance is to increase the number of bunches or the bunch intensities, or both. What are the implications for the hardware systems of the machine (RF, collimators, beam dump, injection, cryogenics, and magnets)?Go to contribution page
-
Rama Calaga29/01/2010, 09:20With lower betas or longer bunches, luminosity loss due to the crossing angle becomes important. Crab cavities could minimize the loss. What are the scenarios for a crab cavity implementation in the LHC, the expected performance gain, hardware implications, R&D plan, the open questions (noise, machine protection, impedance?), issues with space for crab cavities and the auxiliary equipment...Go to contribution page
-
Jean-Pierre Koutchouk29/01/2010, 10:15How can the effective LHC luminosity be optimized by complementary measures, like beam-beam compensation (long-range, head-on?) and luminosity leveling (various schemes)? Which are the merits and challenges of each measure? Are there lessons for the upgrade strategy?Go to contribution page
-
Marzio Nessi29/01/2010, 10:40With the above in mind, which is the preferred upgrade strategy of the LHC experiments? Which upgrades are planned by the experiments, and how do these constrain the LHC upgrade paths?Go to contribution page
-
Mike Lamont29/01/2010, 11:05With the above in mind, and under certain assumptions of machine availability, and turnaround, what monthly integrated luminosities could we expect for various scenarios (e.g. with or without IR upgrade, with or without injector upgrade at various times)?Go to contribution page
Choose timezone
Your profile timezone: