107th BLM Thresholds WG meeting (Preparation of IR3 MD)

Europe/Zurich
774/1-079 (CERN)

774/1-079

CERN

20
Show room on map
Anton Lechner (CERN), Belen Maria Salvachua Ferrando (CERN), Daniele Mirarchi (CERN), Sara Morales Vigo (CERN)

Participants: S.Morales, A.Lechner, B.Salvachua, D.Mirarchi, A.Verweij, K.Taylor, S.Redaelli, F.Titz, H.Timko, E.Carosotti

 

Updated procedure of MD#15209 - D.Mirarchi

  • Two main updates wrt MD1
    • Only partial scraping to avoid triggering BPM interlock on bunch intensity
      • Need to inject more bunches than initially planned
        • For 200kW -> 54 or 28 bunches of 1.6e11p depending if we scrape down to 1sigma or 0.5sigma
        • For 500kW -> 136 or 70 bunches of 1.6e11p depending if we scrape down to 1sigma or 0.5sigma
    • Need to inject trains to have an efficient filling-> request to have trains of 36b
  • No changes on BPM.6 interlock window is necessary
  • Interlock on max RF offset must be increased -> nominal + 400Hz (needed RF shift of +400Hz)
  • Dedicated BLM thresholds deployed just before the MD
  • Updated BLM decomposition matrix for 2025 to be loaded on LSA
  • Typical BIS mask of loss maps 
  • Main focus on B2 -> off-momentum losses in B1 are caught in IR7 at start of ramp
  • Gradual approach with higher intensities injected until achieved target power loss
    • Will try to adjust loss rate speed and sustain target power loss for some seconds
  • Belen comments that we should test at low intensity if there are any interlocks triggering
    • Daniele says that for the sake of efficiency, it is better to mask the first test with setup beam
  • Belen comments that for unforeseen limitations, we will not change the thresholds
  • Belen asks Stefano if someone from collimation could be present to check temperatures of collimators, magnets, etc
    • Anton says there might be a dump on the passive absorber as it gets much more loaded than the case in IR7 
  • Q6 IR3 operating at low current -> Arjan confirms there is no problem with doing the test for this magnet
  • Implementation of thresholds can be done as soon as the previous MD dumps

 

 

BLM thresholds changes for MD#15209 - B.Salvachua

  • Implementation of offline changes after the meeting
  • Q6 quench levels much lower than MQY/MQM
    • About a factor of 10 lower
    • Conclusion from Arjan was that if the magnet is running at low current it is ok to probe the quench limit
      • It is the case for injection energy
  • IR3 TCLA at 450GeV expected power deposition below IR7 TCLA at 6.8TeV -> ok from thermomechanical simulation point of view -> Federico and Luisa
  • Pierre said that there was significant margin at 500kW found on the studies of power dissipation
  • OK to probe the limit for 500kW
  • Analysis for rise of thresholds done for start of ramp fills from 18th to 20th of August
  • Anton comments that we could think of a similar test with B1 next year without the phase knob
  • TCTPV in IR2 needs a factor of 4 increase -> higher than what we had in the ion run
  • In IR3 the BLM at the Q6 is the one requiring the highest factor -> around 10
  • Some BLMs that appear requiring an increase are expected to be due to the scaling of B1 (which will not be used in the test)
  • The TCP needs a correction in the short RS -> will require an increase of master thresholds and MF
  • Scaling from pilot beam test with the RF trim will include a large error due to low BLM signals
    • BLMs in IR8 will be neglected -> due to injection protection in 
  • A factor of 2 higher on the pilot beam scaling, it seems probable to a be a scaling error
    • Will not be included in the changes
  • Applied threshold on TCTPV IR2 is still lower than what was in the ion run -> acceptable
  • Scaling based on the largest factor needed for the RS 
  • TCP threshold same order of magnitude as in IP7
  • TCSG threshold slightly higher than IP7 at top energy
  • TCLA not including the ones from B1 -> threshold comparable with the expected from simulations
  • Rest of proposed thresholds as expected
  • Q6 a factor of 10 higher -> what we want to probe
  • Stefano comments that if there are unexpected interlocks from collimator temperature they should not be changed in the night 

 

There are minutes attached to this event. Show them.