Speaker
Description
Particle physics experiments rely on the (generalised) likelihood ratio test (LRT) for searches and measurements, which consist of composite hypothesis tests. However, this test is not guaranteed to be optimal, as the Neyman-Pearson lemma pertains only to simple hypothesis tests. Any choice of test statistic thus implicitly determines how statistical power varies across the parameter space. An improvement in the core statistical testing methodology for general settings with composite tests would have widespread ramifications across experiments. We discuss an alternate test statistic that provides the data analyzer an ability to focus the power of the test on physics-motivated regions of the parameter space. We demonstrate the improvement from this technique compared to the LRT on a Higgs →ττ open dataset simulated by the ATLAS experiment and a dark matter dataset inspired by the LZ experiment. This method is made reliable with machine learning to efficiently perform the Neyman construction, which is essential to ensure statistically valid confidence intervals.
| I read the instructions above | Yes |
|---|