27 September 2015 to 3 October 2015
Kobe, Fashion Mart, Japan
Japan timezone

Elliptic Anisotropy $v_2$ May Be Dominated by Particle Escape instead of Hydrodynamic Flow

30 Sept 2015, 12:10
20m
KFM Hall "IO"

KFM Hall "IO"

Contributed talk Collective Dynamics Collective Dynamics IV

Speaker

Zi-Wei Lin (ECU)

Description

It is commonly believed that azimuthal anisotropies in relativistic heavy ion collisions are generated by hydrodynamic evolution of the strongly interacting quark-gluon plasma. Recently, apparent anisotropy signals have been observed in small systems of proton- and deuteron-nucleus collisions, and the signals can again be described by hydrodynamics. A natural question is why hydrodynamics still seems to be applicable to such small systems. Since A Multi-Phase Transport (AMPT), like hydrodynamics, has been quite successful in describing a large amount of experimental data, we investigate the generation of anisotropies in AMPT by analyzing the complete parton collision history. We also use another transport model, the MPC/Cascade, to check the model dependence of our results. To our surprise, we find [1] that the majority of $v_2$ comes from the anisotropic escape of partons, not from the parton collective flow, for semi-central Au+Au collisions at 200A GeV. Hydrodynamic-type collective flow will eventually dominate over the escape mechanism at unrealistically large parton cross sections. However, even at the parton cross section of 40 mb, the escape mechanism still contributes to about one-third of the final parton $v_2$. The picture is qualitatively the same from both transport models, and for the smaller d+Au system the escape mechanism is more dominant as expected. Our results thus show that elliptic anisotropy $v_2$ is dominated by particle escape instead of hydrodynamic flow in transport models. If confirmed, our finding could change the paradigm of anisotropic flow. Our results also suggest the need for hydrodynamics to include the escape mechanism, without which the extracted viscosity to entropy density ($\eta/s$) ratio would be severely underestimated. [1] L. He, T. Edmonds, Z.W. Lin, F. Liu, D. Molnar, F.Q. Wang. ArXiv:1502.05572 [nucl-th].
On behalf of collaboration: NONE

Primary authors

Prof. Denes Molnar (Purdue University) Prof. Feng Liu (Central China Normal University) Prof. Fuqiang Wang (Purdue University (US)) Mr Liang He (Purdue University) Mr Terrence Edmonds (University of Florida) Zi-Wei Lin (ECU)

Presentation materials