Description
Important to stress not only the 'Computing Model' styles of steady-state operation, but also the more chaotic data access patterns that are likely to typify early data taking (e.g. more requests from more sites to access to raw/ESD files - impact on resources...)
Note-takers:
- Simone Campana
- Pablo Saiz
-
Jos Engelen (CERN)23/04/2008, 09:00
-
Harry Renshall (CERN)23/04/2008, 09:20
-
Kors Bos (NIKHEF, CERN, ATLAS)23/04/2008, 10:35
-
Nick Brook (University of Bristol, LHCb)23/04/2008, 11:20
-
Daniele Bonacorsi (INFN & CMS)23/04/2008, 13:05
-
Latchezar Betev (CERN)23/04/2008, 13:50
-
Markus Schulz (CERN), Oliver Keeble (CERN)23/04/2008, 14:35
-
Flavia Donno (CERN)23/04/2008, 14:45
-
23/04/2008, 15:25Some of the topics:
- Common convention for operator alarm mailing lists
- For CERN, -> vo-operator-alarm@cern.ch; co-owned by experiment and IT; only list-members may post
- For external sites; implement NIKHEF's solution
- Dashboards: need clear agreement on what sites should look at (site view?)
- Intervention notifications - including also 'transparent'...
- Common convention for operator alarm mailing lists
-
23/04/2008, 16:25
-
23/04/2008, 17:10