5th Inter-experiment Machine Learning Workshop

Survey

IML workshop survey

Attendance

How did you attend ?

Monday Tutorial*

No

Remotely

In Person

Tuesday plenary, Wed DS seminar and industry session*

No

Mostly remotely

Mostly in person

Workshop (Tuesday end of afternoon, Wed, Thu, Fri) : what fraction did you attend in-person ?*

0%

10%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Workshop (Tuesday end of afternoon, Wed, Thu, Fri) what fraction did you attend online ?*

0%

10%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Scientific Organization

How would you rate the scientific organization of the program?

No selection

Poor

Satisfactory

Good

Excellent

Would you say that overall, the amount of free time for discussion was :

No selection

much too little

too little

enough

too much

much too much

How would you rate the quality of the JAX tutorial?

No selection

Poor

Satisfactory

Good

Excellent

Any remark/suggestion on the JAX tutorial ?

How would you rate the overall quality of the plenary talks on Tuesday and Wed DS seminar and industry session ?

No selection

Poor

Satisfactory

Good

Excellent

...which of these plenary talks you are most likely to recommend to colleagues ? (speaker's last name)

Any remarks/suggestions on these plenary talks ?

How would you rate the overall quality of the workshop talks?

No selection

Poor

Satisfactory

Good

Excellent

...which of these workshop talks you are most likely to recommend to colleagues ? (speaker's last name)

For the workshop session, submissions were accepted with a low threshold. We've had 32 25' talks (discussion included), 11 15' talks, 17 5' lightning talks and no poster. This is about 17 hours in 3 days.

How many hours of talks would have been ideal in the 3 days workshop sessions ?

No selection

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Which of these options could be considered to reduce the overall talk durations ? (considering it might have impacted your talk)

move most 25' talks to 15'

move many 15' talks to 5' or poster

move all lightning talks to poster

refuse a significant fraction of talks

accept a significant fraction of talks as poster only

If you've given a talk, how would you rate the experience ?

No selection

Poor

Satisfactory

Good

Excellent

Any remark/suggestion on how to improve the experience of giving a talk at IML workshop ?

Any other remark/suggestion on the workshop part (Wed to Fri essentially ) ?

Any other remark/suggestion on the overall scientific organisation ?

Logistics and social event

How would you rate the overall logistics of the event ?

No selection

Poor

Satisfactory

Good

Excellent

How did you like the happy hour Thursday end of afternoon ?

No selection

Poor

Satisfactory

Good

Excellent

If it was your first time at CERN, any remark/suggestion ?

Any other remark/suggestion on the logistics and social event ?

Now about you

Your gender

No selection

Female

Male

Your academic status*

before PhD

doing PhD

<4 years after PhD

11 to 20 years after PhD

>20 years after PhD

engineer

None of the above

Your primary background*

High Energy Physics

non HEP physics

Computer science

None of the above

Your country of affiliation*

Any final comment/suggestion on anything which could not fit the above ?

Last chance...

If a similar IML workshop takes place next year, how likely would you recommend colleagues to attend in person ?

No selection

Very unlikely

Unlikely

Likely

Very likely

Your answers will be submitted anonymously.