- Compact style
- Indico style
- Indico style - inline minutes
- Indico style - numbered
- Indico style - numbered + minutes
- Indico Weeks View
Help us make Indico better by taking this survey! Aidez-nous à améliorer Indico en répondant à ce sondage !
https://cern.zoom.us/j/66586421590?pwd=TVZ4WEdtaDRQNFBkNitUTm4rTG83Zz09
To discuss:
- 3 RCS with: NC RCS in SPS tunnel, NC and hybrid RCS in LHC tunnel
- 3 RCS with: NC and hybrid RCS in SPS tunnel, hybrid RCS in LHC tunnel
- 2 RCS with: NC RCS in SPS tunnel and hybrid RCS in LHC tunnel
Few open points for follow-up:
Priority 1
Optimize losses in RCS chain for best overall performance, allowing different transmission in the two or three machines
Acceptable longitudinal emittance growth in the RCS chain and how to quantify it exactly?
How do define a reasonable synchronous phase?
Average gradient of RF sections
Transient beam loading and counter-rotating bunches and multi-turn effects?
Longitudinal matching
Can the ILC cavity (possibly in a modified form) be used for the muon RCS?
Resistive wall impedance?
More detailed lattice model, beyond smooth approximation.
Introduce chromaticity in transverse studies, do we need sextupoles?
Priority 2
Cost functions per machine part: could one make an assumption for a cost per unit length of RF (plus some infrastructure cost offset per RF section), idem for unit length of magnets?
Would two RCS be sufficient to accelerate from 60 GeV to 1.5 TeV?
Is transition gamma of ~20 a good number for the first RCS stage?
Further options
Treated, at least in some detail
What are the consequences if we want to use the LHC as the last accelerator ring?
Average gradient of RF sections