26th meeting on HEMAC discussions

Europe/Zurich
6/R-012 - conference room (CERN)

6/R-012 - conference room

CERN

40
Show room on map
Description

https://cern.zoom.us/j/66586421590?pwd=TVZ4WEdtaDRQNFBkNitUTm4rTG83Zz09

Videoconference
HEMAC discussions
Zoom Meeting ID
66586421590
Host
Heiko Damerau
Useful links
Join via phone
Zoom URL
    • 16:30 17:00
      Choice of baseline scenario for RCS chain parameters in existing CERN tunnels 30m

      To discuss:
      - 3 RCS with: NC RCS in SPS tunnel, NC and hybrid RCS in LHC tunnel
      - 3 RCS with: NC and hybrid RCS in SPS tunnel, hybrid RCS in LHC tunnel
      - 2 RCS with: NC RCS in SPS tunnel and hybrid RCS in LHC tunnel

      Speakers: David Amorim (CERN), Fabian Batsch (CERN)
    • 17:00 17:15
      Status of RF parameters in RLA2 15m
      • Input to parameter table update
      Speakers: Leonard Thiele (Rostock University (DE)), Rebecca Taylor (CERN)
    • 17:15 17:29
      Discussion 14m
      Speakers: Alexej Grudiev (CERN), Antoine Chance (CEA Irfu), David Amorim (CERN), Elias Metral (CERN), Fabian Batsch (CERN), Heiko Damerau (CERN), Ivan Karpov (CERN)
    • 17:29 17:30
      Follow-up points 1m

      Few open points for follow-up:

      Priority 1

      • Optimize losses in RCS chain for best overall performance, allowing different transmission in the two or three machines

        • Difficult with lots of degrees of freedom: straight-forward only for constant acceleration
        • Difficulty of different magnets (ramp rate)
        • How to distribute total RF length over different machines? Minimization of overall total voltage?
      • Acceptable longitudinal emittance growth in the RCS chain and how to quantify it exactly?

        • Needs figure from low-energy acceleration (low energy), longitudinal emittance for colliders as a starting point. Criteria also on how much bunch is distorted. What is acceptable bunch shape deviation in the collider?
      • How do define a reasonable synchronous phase?

        • First start for constant acceleration, then real ramps
      • Average gradient of RF sections

        • 1.3 GHz: agreed 30 MV/m (conservative) and 45 MV/m (aggressive)
        • 800 MHz?
      • Transient beam loading and counter-rotating bunches and multi-turn effects?

        • Avoid that counter-rotating bunches meet in RF section
        • Impact on placement of RF around the circumference?
      • Longitudinal matching

        • How to generate the short bunch length required for the transfer into the collider ring?
        • Longitudinal matching of RCS with pre-acceleration stages (injection) and collider (ejection)
      • Can the ILC cavity (possibly in a modified form) be used for the muon RCS?

        • Power in higher-order modes (HOMs) is potential show-stopper
        • Need refined paek and average power calculations for HOM couplers
      • Resistive wall impedance?

        • David following chamber materials
      • More detailed lattice model, beyond smooth approximation.

        • David developed a MAD-X lattice generator (from high-level machine parameters for muon RCS)
      • Introduce chromaticity in transverse studies, do we need sextupoles?

      Priority 2

      • Cost functions per machine part: could one make an assumption for a cost per unit length of RF (plus some infrastructure cost offset per RF section), idem for unit length of magnets?

      • Would two RCS be sufficient to accelerate from 60 GeV to 1.5 TeV?

        • Does not look very attractive
      • Is transition gamma of ~20 a good number for the first RCS stage?

        • Check various transition gammas and their impact -> David to present

      Further options

      • FFA alternative for RCS?

      Treated, at least in some detail

      • What are the consequences if we want to use the LHC as the last accelerator ring?

        • Check consequences, check Shiltsev proposal: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-0221/13/10/T10003
        • 5 TeV cannot reached in the LHC tunnel
      • Average gradient of RF sections

        • Agreed during collaboration workshops to keep two values: 30 MV/m (conservative) and 45 MV/m (aggressive)