10–12 Apr 2018
CERN
Europe/Zurich timezone

Contribution List

36 out of 36 displayed
Export to PDF
  1. Andy Buckley (University of Glasgow (GB)), Jonathan Butterworth (University College London (UK))
    10/04/2018, 14:05
  2. Christian Gutschow (University College London (UK))
    10/04/2018, 14:35
  3. Markus Seidel (CERN), Xavier Janssen (University of Antwerp (BE))
    10/04/2018, 14:55
  4. Alex Grecu (IFIN-HH (RO)), Gloria Corti (CERN)
    10/04/2018, 15:05
  5. Andy Buckley (University of Glasgow (GB)), Lukas Alexander Heinrich (New York University (US)), Zachary Louis Marshall (University of California Berkeley (US))
    10/04/2018, 15:15
  6. David Yallup (University College London), Jonathan Butterworth (University College London (UK))
    10/04/2018, 15:45
  7. Przemyslaw Karczmarczyk (Warsaw University of Technology (PL))
    10/04/2018, 16:05
  8. Christian Bierlich (Lund University (SE)), Leif Lönnblad (Lund University (SE))
    10/04/2018, 16:25
  9. Frank Martin Krauss (University of Durham (GB))
    11/04/2018, 09:00
  10. Kenneth Long (University of Wisconsin Madison (US))
    11/04/2018, 09:15
  11. Johannes Bellm (Lund)
    11/04/2018, 09:30
  12. Redmer Alexander Bertens (Nikhef National institute for subatomic physics (NL))
    11/04/2018, 09:45
  13. Olivier Mattelaer (UCLouvain)
    11/04/2018, 10:00
  14. Josh McFayden (University College London (UK))
    11/04/2018, 10:15
  15. Leif Lönnblad (Lund University (SE))
    11/04/2018, 10:30
  16. Philip Ilten (University of Birmingham (GB))
    11/04/2018, 11:30
  17. Marian Heil (IPPP), Jeppe Rosenkrantz Andersen (IPPP, University of Durham (UK))
    11/04/2018, 11:45
  18. Ulrike Schnoor (CERN)
    11/04/2018, 12:00
  19. Jonathan Butterworth (University College London (UK)), Andy Buckley (University of Glasgow (GB))
    11/04/2018, 12:15
  20. Stefan Gieseke
    11/04/2018, 16:00
  21. Frederic Stichelbaut
    11/04/2018, 16:05
  22. Michael König
    11/04/2018, 16:35
  23. Mark Beinker
    11/04/2018, 17:05
  24. Vincent Boucher
    11/04/2018, 17:35
  25. Mr Federico Ambrogi (CP3 Centre for Cosmology, Particle Physics and Phenomenology )
    12/04/2018, 10:00

    We present the recently published MadDM v.3.0, now a plugin of Madgraph5_aMC@NLO.
    The new release extends the capabilities of the previous versions with a dedicated module for dark matter indirect detection. MadDM is now able to generate energy spectra from dark matter annihilation, calculate cosmic rays fluxes and compare the theory predictions with the Fermi-LAT upper limits from the...

    Go to contribution page
  26. Ms Joanna Huang
    12/04/2018, 10:20
  27. Mr Alan Price
    12/04/2018, 10:25
  28. Ms Smita Chakraborty (Lund University)
    12/04/2018, 11:00

    Introduction as a new MCnet Ph.D. student at LU and short description of the first research project

    Go to contribution page
  29. Leif Gellersen (Lund University)
    12/04/2018, 11:05

    A short introduction about myself as a new PhD student at Lund University.

    Go to contribution page
  30. Ms Christine Rasmussen
    12/04/2018, 11:10

    Update on ongoing activities in Pyhtia.

    Go to contribution page
  31. Christian Bierlich (Lund University (SE))
    12/04/2018, 11:35

    The Pythia event generator has seen a lot of progress relating to modeling heavy ion collisions, in the parton-level stacking framework known as Angantyr. Several of the ideas behind Angantyr are, however, not local to Pythia, and it is therefore possible to implement them in a generator independent way.
    We present the initial version of such an implementation, which essentially allows for...

    Go to contribution page
  32. Harsh Shah (Lund University)
    12/04/2018, 12:00
  33. James Black (IPPP)
    12/04/2018, 14:00

    Presenting the first set of LL corrections to sub-leading processes within W+Jets in HEJ. This adds resummation to many processes previously only matched to FO.

    Go to contribution page
  34. Baptiste Cabouat (University of Manchester)
    12/04/2018, 14:20

    Double parton scattering is usually suppressed by single parton scattering. However, in some specific regions of phase-space, the differential cross-sections are comparable. Also, for a given final state, it might happen that the double parton scattering is the dominant contribution if the single parton scattering is suppressed by a higher multiplicity of couplings. For these reasons, it turns...

    Go to contribution page
  35. Rob Verheyen (Radboud University Nijmegen)
    12/04/2018, 14:40

    Most parton showers currently work in the leading colour limit, allowing for coherent gluonic radiation through either angular ordering or the dipole/antenna formalist. For photon emission, the equivalent type of radiation in QED, there is no leading colour limit and the soft structure is more complicated. In this talk, I will discuss how we are including photonic emissions into the Vincia...

    Go to contribution page
  36. Armando Bermudez Martinez (CMS-DESY)
    12/04/2018, 15:00

    Following the recent measurements I did within the CMS collaboration I will bring up some still remaining open issues in closely back-to-back dijet topologies in 2- and 3-jet inclusive events. There are considerable differences observed (up to 15%) and 2- and 3-jet data is not described by any of the models considered simultaneously. Also the unexpected behavior of Madgraph interfaced with...

    Go to contribution page