Sep 12 – 17, 2010
CERN
Europe/Zurich timezone
The conference is now over. Thanks to all for their participation. <p> The talks from the various sessions are all online.

Ab initio calculations and PAC study of 111In-doped (Hf/Zr)3Al2 and (Hf/Zr)4Al3 mixed compounds. EFG´s and site preference

Not scheduled
500/1-001 - Main Auditorium (CERN)

500/1-001 - Main Auditorium

CERN

CH - 1211 Geneva 23 Switzerland
72
Show room on map
POSTER Theory: Hyperfine Interactions, Nuclear Moments

Speakers

Prof. Helena Petrilli (Instituto de Fisica, Universidade de Sao Paulo, CP 66318, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil) Prof. K. Peter Lieb (II. Physikalisches Institut, Georg-August-Universität, 37077 Göttingen, Germany) Prof. Leonardo Errico (Dto. de Física and Instituto de Física La Plata (CONICET-UNLP), Fac. de Cs. Exactas, UNLP, Argentina and Universidad Nacional del Noroeste Bonaerense (UNNOBA),Pergamino, Argentina) Dr Pavel Wodniecki (Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland) agnieszka Kulińska (Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland and II. Physikalisches Institut, Georg-August-Universität, 37077 Göttingen, Germany)

Description

text

Summary

Hyperfine interactions and, in particular, electric field gradients (EFG), constitute a very sensitive tool to investigate the local environment of probe nuclei. Their measurement using Perturbed Angular Correlation (PAC) spectroscopy can provide detailed information on structural and electronic properties. In a well defined single-phase crystal with known lattice structure the interpretation of such measurements is usually not too difficult. But, in more complicated cases, such as multi-phase samples or systems with several crystallographic sites, the interpretation of the various EFG fractions is by no means straightforward. Arguments based on point charge summations or symmetry considerations may fail, since the chemical nature of the impurity causing structural distortions of its neighborhood is not taken into account. To unravel these complex cases, a realistic theory which models different structural and electronic scenarios is mandatory.
In the last decade, a systematic study of the EFGs of 181Hf→181Ta and 111In→111Cd probe nuclei in the full series of hafnium and zirconium aluminides has been carried out [1]. Recently, successful attempts have been made in the compounds Zr4Al3 and Hf4Al3 to assign the EFGs of 181Hf→181Ta probes to the possible lattice sites and even to distinguish among the lattice structures deduced from X-ray diffraction. Indeed, these EFGs have given evidence of substitutional Zr/Hf sites [2], as confirmed by calculations using the full-potential augmented plane wave + local orbitals formalism (APW+lo).
The present work addresses the more complicated problem of which lattice sites 111In→111Cd probes prefer in these aluminides. Evidently these probe atoms are different from the constituents of the aluminides. We report here on a theoretical and experimental study of the quadrupolar hyperfine interactions of ion-diffused 111In→111Cd probes in polycrystalline isostructural (Zr/Hf)4Al3 samples containing small admixtures of the phases (Zr/Hf)3Al2. Strong preference of 111In solutes for the (Zr/Hf)3Al2 minority phases was observed. Detailed calculations of the EFGs and energetic considerations using the APW+lo theory allowed us to assign unambiguously the observed four EFG fractions to the various lattice sites of 111In→111Cd in (Zr/Hf)3Al2 and to explain the preferential site occupation of 111In in the minority phases.

References
[1] P. Wodniecki, A. Kulińska, B. Wodniecka, M. Uhrmacher, and K. P. Lieb, Hyperfine Interact. 158, 339 and 429 (2005), and references given there.
[2] P. Wodniecki, A. Kulińska, B. Wodniecka, S. Cottenier, H. M. Petrilli, M. Uhrmacher, and K. P. Lieb, Europhys. Lett. 77, 43001 (2007).

Please specify whether you would prefer an oral or poster contribution. oral

Primary authors

Prof. Helena Petrilli (Instituto de Fisica, Universidade de Sao Paulo, CP 66318, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil) Dr Jelena Belosevic-Cavor (VINCA Institute of Nuclear Sciences, 11001 Belgrade, Serbia) Prof. K. Peter Lieb (II. Physikalisches Institut, Georg-August-Universität, 37077 Göttingen, Germany) Prof. Leonardo Errico (Dto. de Física and Instituto de Física La Plata (CONICET-UNLP), Fac. de Cs. Exactas, UNLP, Argentina and Universidad Nacional del Noroeste Bonaerense (UNNOBA),Pergamino, Argentina) Dr Luis A. Terrazos (Universidade Federal de Campina Grande, Centro de Educaçăo e Saude, Brazil) Prof. Michel Uhrmacher (II. Physikalisches Institut, Georg-August-Universität, 37077 Göttingen, Germany) Dr Pavel Wodniecki (Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland) agnieszka Kulińska (Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland and II. Physikalisches Institut, Georg-August-Universität, 37077 Göttingen, Germany)

Presentation materials

There are no materials yet.