The Joint Accelerator Performance 2024 Workshop (JAP24) will take place from 10 to 12 December 2024 at the Royal Plaza Montreux.
The JAP24 Workshop is meant to bring together accelerator and operation teams across the accelerator complex, with the input from the experiments. Its focus will be performance achievements, limitations and lessons from 2024 as a key to define configuration and performance goals for 2025. It is intended to be a forum for open technical discussion with a strong emphasis on new topics and results.
The bilateral sessions are built around the main pillars of accelerator performance: operation, equipment, modelling and automation.
The JAP24 Workshop will address:
The main outcomes of the workshop are expected to be:
Please note that attendance is by invitation only, while a Zoom link will be made available throughout the workshop as webcast.
Keywords: Achievements (FT, LIU), Stand vs. BCMS, protons & ions, equipment needing attention and progress in monitoring, limitations emerged and perspectives, impact on operational efficiency of filling scheme (3x 36b vs hybrid)
Keywords: BSI calibration results, ASM planning proton sharing, electron beam quality in H6/H8 electron users, High intensity muon beam test in M2 (road to have higher intensity post-LS3), record high intensity electrons in H4, operation of H4-VLE (Neutrino Platform), CEDARs operation, user changeovers/preparations/planning, low momentum in East Area, East Area variable spill lengths. Major faults from AFT, feedback on expert availabilities feedback from HiRadMat
Keywords: Operation of facilities, is modeling adequate, e.g., optics, impedance, aperture?, opportunities for automation and test bench new algorithms, critical equipment, integration of operation, need for instrumentation? feedback from experiments (AD/ELENA, AWAKE)
Keywords: 2024 highlights of EA, NA, nTOF, ISOLDE physics results (‘where protons are going’), beam quality (client view), upcoming expectations for 2025-6 (physics/infrastructure requirements & beam characteristics)
Keywords: Achievements and limitations, Standard vs. BCMS (brightness, tails), beam quality from injectors and preservation, high intensity, protons & ions, equipment fault analysis (why was summer such a good production period), operational efficiency, super-smooth injection and filling. Summary of ion operation.
Keywords: 2024 highlights of physics results (‘where protons are going’), beam quality (client view), upcoming expectations for 2025-6 (physics/infrastructure requirements & beam characteristics)
Keywords: MD threads & requests, MD time allocation & adequacy including preparation (e.g., prep for LHC MDs in injectors), impact of intensity limitations on MD program (injectors, LHC), organisation and execution, relevance to operation
Prospect of running ISOLDE with higher intensity per shot in 2025 in view of future proton sharing, and status of upgrade project
Higher intensity for TOF
Fixed-target beams: bunch length/momentum spread/beam size (PSB, PS), spill quality (PS/SPS), losses
Higher intensity requests for North-Area post-LS3 + Beamline acceptance.
Beam for BDF/SHiP and intensity increase to 7e13, future beam sharing (different scenarios for proton sharing in the SHiP-BDF time) MDs related and proposed tests before LS3.
Where do we stand concerning losses and activation for high intensity beams?
Overview 2024
LHC oxygen run in 2025
Development for future ions after LS3
Status of the source and LINAC3 accelerator model
ALICE background and crystals stability
Beam quality in the injectors, in particular LEIR and SPS (issue in 2023). What should be improved or done differently?
Emittance growth and tail generation along the chain: mechanism, mitigation, and impact in LHC itself; influence of PS transition, transfer lines matching, degradation beyond burn-off.
Losses in PS-to-SPS, SPS, and at LHC injection: why is the situation improved in 2024? (blindable BLMs to be commissioned if long trains?)
Optimization of LHC2025 filling scheme in terms of filling time / beam degradation in SPS vs LHC (could be moved to the last talk)
Special beams: MDs, vdM, Impact of LINAC4 Automatic Feed Forward on reproducibility during beam adjustment
LHC beams: longitudinal beam quality across the injectors (splitting reproducibility), have we gained any operational margin with LIU beams during 2024? (injectors topics and on the LHC impact on quality only)
Phase knob, collimator hierarchy breakage, DA simulations: how models feed into operation settings (theoretical modelling, simulations and understanding)
Tail population from scraping (EoF + MD), LRBB wire compensator effect on tail population, …
Beam studies towards a dedicated SPS collimation system
LEIR - progress / challenges to optics measurement (tools, BPMs, lack of good models)
PS - zero dispersion optics to improve emittance measurement, deconvolution tests, comment on viability to other machines if progress made
LHC - general status of optics studies - what is standard vs expert. What developments of tools are needed.
LHC - AC-dipole status - critical spares.
LHC commissioning with high ATS factors - experience and challenges
LHC vertical dispersion (single pass for alice background, general Dy control becoming relevant e.g. hierarchy
LHC NL corrections and operation (a3 for hierarchy, b4 for kmod, challenges for high-order and a4, new a4 strategy for next year, 3Qy at injection + ecloud losses)
LHC calibration optics (ballistic + 60deg) use and lessons learned
LHC collimator hierarchy breakage operational response, mitigations
FASER/SND background, cures, compatibility with RP optics
LHC aperture: measurements and performance (beta*/xing angle) reach
Intensity limits at LHC from RF vacuum modules - can we unlock for 2025? RF fingers and bunch intensity limitation? (just a slide on long. Bunch. Control over ramp)
RP optics, crossing planes, flat optics, consider the use of flat optics either for necessity in the HV crossing configuration or for performance in the current VH configuration (e.g. 30/20cm). Further improvements: reducing the xing angle at the end of leveling? + wire …?
E-cloud modelling and heat-load in cold magnets (only impact on performance 2025-HL, confirmed trend from previous years?)
Optimal filling scheme
BCMS vs STD (only impact on: which one give us longer levelling?)
usage of the BBLR wires
optimal filling time and lumi predictions
What can / should be tested ‘transparently’ before LS3 to prepare HL-LHC era (incl. intensity limits)?
2024 report: settings-related issues and improvements
Future plans: what will be done in 2025 and beyond, with resource requests
Settings management in the automation context: online checks for all machines, avoiding trim conflicts (human <-> controller, controller <-> controller)
(Replacement of CESAR)
Beam scheduling: progress in 2024 and future plans
Automatic LHC beam preparation
Progress in 2024 across complex (online beam quality monitoring, optimizers, sequences / orchestration)
Future plans and missing pieces across complex (PSB, PS, SPS)
Frameworks: mostly generic steering (experience in 2024, limitations, plans)
Status & plans for automatic controllers:
What is used operationally, under development? E.g. PS MTE efficiency, SPS spill noise, LEIR progress, automation tests at CLEAR, LHC collimators & procedures for alignment
Where do we want to be by LS3?
Other: continuous optimization vs on-demand, interaction between controllers
Feedback from operation team on usability and integration of automation tools
How to improve interaction with controllers (e.g. manual intervention)
Limitations: diagnostics / monitoring, performance of autopilots
Automatic fault tracking and analysis
Xsuite: overview on status and long term plans.
Opportunities from transitioning to modern technologies(e.g. python integration, live simulations in operation and MD, integration of AI)
Integration of (full) simulators in control system - status, challenges, required collaborations
Synergies in modelling and design choices between next generation of accelerators and present ones.
Current status of equipment integration description and configuration across sector and ongoing efforts (E2A)
Where do we want to go?
Are current efforts for cleaning up “digital thread” sufficient?
NXCALS, JAPC, LSA: overview of users needs and experience
Introduce “Smart and agile equipment paradigm” from EPA WP8: online and offline analysis requirements
Introduce the developments of DPP and timelines
What about GPUs for advanced analysis and integration of active and continual learning schemes?
Why surrogate models and why surrogates with ML?
How to incorporate inductive bias? PINNs, symmetries,…
Examples and prospects
Infrastructure requirements for full integration in control room (storage, refer back to previous talk,…)
Status and prospects for required magnetic measurements
Modeling techniques
Timeline and prospects
How much time do equipment experts and piquets spend on remote and local interventions?
Is there sufficient data available across the groups to do this analysis?
What kind of data exists across the groups (what is logged?) and what would be needed in addition to extend the analysis?
Can we quantify the potential gain from automating remote interventions?
Can we differentiate between simple local interventions and more complex ones? Can this information be included in AFT or any other centralised tracking tool?
What standards are in place to detail and document interventions in the different groups? What are the similarities and differences?
How can we avoid that equipment experts spend so much time supporting operations?
How are we using fault data today and what is the vision for the future?
Do we have a full overview of all systems now?
Does the available data allow us to do global prognostics?
What operational solutions exist today for anomaly detection for prognostics (include examples from the different groups, e.g. MKP in SPS, KFA71 in PS, …)
What are the different prospects and ideas to fault recording across the accelerators and groups in the future?
Is there any MD time requested before LS3 related to the points addressed in the talk?
How can we avoid that equipment experts spend so much time supporting operations?
Include an overview of which and how interventions are done remotely across groups.
Which interventions can be automated and what has to be considered (robustness of the solutions, extensive pre-studies and risk analysis of possible failure modes, redundancy designed into the system, remote diagnostics and resets, additional hardware requirements, …)
What is the status of automated equipment testing (AccTesting) across the complex?
What is the status of post-mortem and maintenance prediction?
Examples of application: drift correction of crystal channeling orientation in SPS and LHC
EPA WP8 status
MKP/MKDH automatic vacuum analysis
RF automation (automatic gain switching in the SPS LLRF)
…
Is there any MD time requested before LS3 related to the points addressed in the talk?
Development philosophy of accelerator modelling tools
What tools are available outside of CERN? What do companies do today?
include a good example of the classic approach to hardware design simulations compared to a modern approach using faster and potentially even more precise tools
What needs to and can be done to replace parameter scans with optimisation algorithms? What’s the potential benefit to the desing process?
How can surrogate models be used to replace heavy simulations (ANSYS, OPERA, particle tracking, …)
Show examples of design processes across different groups (first automated studies in STI, ABT, what about other groups such as MSC, RF, BI?)
Address the topic of virtual diagnostics
ABT MKP ferrite temperature, STI target temperature
Digital twins - what’s the status across groups?
Is there any MD time requested before LS3 related to the points addressed in the talk?